Saudi Arabia’s Record-High Executions Draw Sharp International Condemnation Amid Western Engagement
Rights organisations decry Riyadh’s unprecedented use of capital punishment in 2025 even as the kingdom strengthens Western diplomatic and economic ties
Saudi Arabia has executed an unprecedented number of individuals in 2025, surpassing prior annual tallies and prompting sustained criticism from international human rights organisations who argue the surge undermines global rights standards even as the kingdom courts western partners.
According to official tallies and independent tracking, at least three hundred and forty people have been put to death this year, exceeding the previous record set in 2024 and marking the highest number of executions on record.
The latest confirmed executions included three Saudi nationals in the Makkah region who were convicted of murder, bringing the year’s total to an historic peak.
The majority of the deaths in 2025 have been linked to drug-related offences, reflecting the government’s intensified enforcement of narcotics laws, which rights advocates contend imposes capital punishment for crimes that do not meet internationally accepted thresholds for the death penalty.
Around two-thirds of those executed this year were convicted on drug charges, and many were foreign nationals, intensifying concerns about procedural fairness, language barriers and access to proper legal representation.
Human rights groups have highlighted the growing use of the death penalty against vulnerable populations, noting that defendants often face opaque trials with limited transparency and scant due process protections.
Critics have also underscored cases in which individuals with tenuous links to violent crime — including journalists and alleged political detainees — have been executed, calling attention to broader patterns of repression.
One of the most cited cases in 2025 was the execution of Saudi journalist Turki bin Abdulaziz al-Jasser in June, who had been detained since 2018 on charges broadly framed as high treason and terrorism and was executed without clear public documentation of the evidence or trial proceedings.
Rights advocates argue that his execution and those of others raise serious questions about the application of anti-terror laws and judicial independence.
Despite the mounting executions, Saudi Arabia continues to deepen diplomatic and economic engagement with Western governments and multinational firms, positioning itself as a partner in regional security and global investment initiatives.
Western leaders have engaged with Riyadh on issues ranging from energy cooperation to regional stability, even as human rights organisations, United Nations experts and civil society groups call for greater scrutiny and accountability.
The contrast between Saudi Arabia’s reform-oriented Vision 2030 narrative and the intensification of capital punishment has become a focal point for critics who say the kingdom’s human rights record should factor more prominently into international relations.
Human rights organisations, including Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, have repeatedly urged Riyadh to impose a moratorium on executions, especially for non-violent offences, and to align its judicial practices with international human rights norms.
They argue that the current trajectory, which sees capital sentences applied at record levels, undermines the rule of law and raises profound ethical and legal concerns about proportionality, fairness and state-sanctioned violence.
As Saudi Arabia prepares to host high-profile global events and expand its diplomatic footprint, the country’s use of the death penalty remains a contentious issue in the dialogue between Riyadh and its Western interlocutors.