U.S. Universities Receive Billions in Foreign Funding from Qatar, China and Saudi Arabia
New federal data reveal extensive overseas gifts and contracts flowing into American higher education, prompting debate over transparency and influence
American universities are receiving substantial sums from foreign governments and affiliated entities, newly published federal data show, highlighting both the scale of international investment and renewed scrutiny of its implications for academic independence and national security.
According to the U.S. Department of Education’s expanded Foreign Gift and Contract database, colleges and universities reported more than $1.1 billion in funding from Qatar and over $285 million from Saudi Arabia during 2025, with China also among the major contributors.
The portal, launched as part of a broader transparency initiative, shows that foreign gifts and contracts disclosed under federal law now total tens of billions of dollars across hundreds of institutions.
Qatar emerges as the single largest foreign source of such funding, with cumulative contributions totalling several billion dollars over multiple years.
The data underscore that overseas support spans a wide range of academic programmes, research partnerships, scholarships and institutionally sponsored initiatives.
A significant share of Qatari funding, for example, has supported branch campuses in Education City, Doha — including affiliates of Cornell University, Carnegie Mellon University and Georgetown University — as well as research grants and student scholarships at U.S. campus locations.
Chinese and other foreign funding similarly underpins research collaborations and educational exchange efforts across multiple disciplines.
University officials defend such contributions as enhancing global partnerships, expanding educational opportunities and bolstering research capacities.
They emphasise that foreign funding supports legitimate academic goals, from scientific innovation to international student scholarships, and that compliance with federal disclosure requirements is central to maintaining integrity.
Nevertheless, the revelations have prompted debate among policymakers, watchdog groups and commentators over whether large foreign contributions may carry implicit influence on institutional priorities, curriculum decisions or campus discourse.
Critics argue that the prominence of funding from countries with strategic interests — including those engaged in geopolitical competition with the United States — warrants careful oversight and public transparency to ensure academic autonomy and safeguard research security.
Federal law requires institutions to report foreign gifts and contracts valued at $250,000 or more in a given year, and the visibility afforded by the new database is intended to enhance public understanding of overseas financial relationships.
As universities continue to disclose successive years of foreign funding, the conversation over balancing global engagement with rigorous accountability appears poised to remain a central issue in U.S. higher education policy.
According to the U.S. Department of Education’s expanded Foreign Gift and Contract database, colleges and universities reported more than $1.1 billion in funding from Qatar and over $285 million from Saudi Arabia during 2025, with China also among the major contributors.
The portal, launched as part of a broader transparency initiative, shows that foreign gifts and contracts disclosed under federal law now total tens of billions of dollars across hundreds of institutions.
Qatar emerges as the single largest foreign source of such funding, with cumulative contributions totalling several billion dollars over multiple years.
The data underscore that overseas support spans a wide range of academic programmes, research partnerships, scholarships and institutionally sponsored initiatives.
A significant share of Qatari funding, for example, has supported branch campuses in Education City, Doha — including affiliates of Cornell University, Carnegie Mellon University and Georgetown University — as well as research grants and student scholarships at U.S. campus locations.
Chinese and other foreign funding similarly underpins research collaborations and educational exchange efforts across multiple disciplines.
University officials defend such contributions as enhancing global partnerships, expanding educational opportunities and bolstering research capacities.
They emphasise that foreign funding supports legitimate academic goals, from scientific innovation to international student scholarships, and that compliance with federal disclosure requirements is central to maintaining integrity.
Nevertheless, the revelations have prompted debate among policymakers, watchdog groups and commentators over whether large foreign contributions may carry implicit influence on institutional priorities, curriculum decisions or campus discourse.
Critics argue that the prominence of funding from countries with strategic interests — including those engaged in geopolitical competition with the United States — warrants careful oversight and public transparency to ensure academic autonomy and safeguard research security.
Federal law requires institutions to report foreign gifts and contracts valued at $250,000 or more in a given year, and the visibility afforded by the new database is intended to enhance public understanding of overseas financial relationships.
As universities continue to disclose successive years of foreign funding, the conversation over balancing global engagement with rigorous accountability appears poised to remain a central issue in U.S. higher education policy.
