Microplastics found in fresh Antarctic snow
Scientists have for the first time found microplastics in freshly fallen Antarctic snow.
Researchers from the University of Canterbury in New Zealand collected samples from 19 sites in Antarctica and each contained tiny plastic fragments.
Microplastics stem from the erosion of plastic materials and are smaller than a grain of rice - sometimes even invisible to the naked eye.
The researchers found an average of 29 particles per liter of melted snow.
They identified 13 different types of plastics and the most common was polyethylene terephthalate (PET), mostly used in soft-drink bottles and clothing. This was found in 79% of the samples.
"The most likely source of these airborne microplastics is local scientific research stations," researcher Alex Aves wrote in the journal, Cryosphere.
"However, modelling shows their origin could have been up to 6,000km (3,700 miles) away."
Previous studies have found microplastic pollution in Antarctic sea ice and surface water, but this is the first reported case in fresh snow.
A major study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences last year said microplastics are spiralling across the globe, often transported by dusts, wind and ocean currents.
In 2020, researchers found microplastics near the summit of Mount Everest. They have also been found in deep oceans.
This form of pollution can have both local and wider effects.
"Microplastics can have harmful substances stuck on to their surfaces such as heavy metals, algae," says Laura Revell, associate professor at Canterbury University, who was also involved in the research.
"So they can provide a way in which harmful species can make it into some remote and sensitive areas, that otherwise wouldn't get there."
Experts also say humans inhale and ingest microplastics via air, water and food.
Not much research has been done on their impact on human health, but one study by the Hull York Medical School and the University of Hull last year found that high levels of ingested microplastics in the human body have the potential to cause harmful effects, including cell death and allergic reactions.
Microplastics may also be increasing the impact of global warming.
Snowfields, ice caps and glaciers around the world are already melting fast, and scientists say dark-coloured microplastics deposited at these locations can make things worse by absorbing sunlight and enhancing local heating.
Clean snowpacks, icefields and glaciers can reflect much of the sunlight, but other polluting particles such as black carbon have also been found on icefields and glaciers of the Himalayas - and scientists say they accelerate the melting there.
Fast-melting glaciers on mountain ranges in different parts of the world are increasingly becoming hazards, leading to landslides and avalanches and causing glacial lakes to burst their banks.
The rapid thinning and retreat of glaciers also poses a threat to water supplies and agriculture in mountain regions around the world.
Microplastics stem from the erosion of plastic materials and are smaller than a grain of rice - sometimes even invisible to the naked eye.
The researchers found an average of 29 particles per liter of melted snow.
They identified 13 different types of plastics and the most common was polyethylene terephthalate (PET), mostly used in soft-drink bottles and clothing. This was found in 79% of the samples.
"The most likely source of these airborne microplastics is local scientific research stations," researcher Alex Aves wrote in the journal, Cryosphere.
"However, modelling shows their origin could have been up to 6,000km (3,700 miles) away."
Previous studies have found microplastic pollution in Antarctic sea ice and surface water, but this is the first reported case in fresh snow.
A major study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences last year said microplastics are spiralling across the globe, often transported by dusts, wind and ocean currents.
In 2020, researchers found microplastics near the summit of Mount Everest. They have also been found in deep oceans.
This form of pollution can have both local and wider effects.
"Microplastics can have harmful substances stuck on to their surfaces such as heavy metals, algae," says Laura Revell, associate professor at Canterbury University, who was also involved in the research.
"So they can provide a way in which harmful species can make it into some remote and sensitive areas, that otherwise wouldn't get there."
Experts also say humans inhale and ingest microplastics via air, water and food.
Not much research has been done on their impact on human health, but one study by the Hull York Medical School and the University of Hull last year found that high levels of ingested microplastics in the human body have the potential to cause harmful effects, including cell death and allergic reactions.
Microplastics may also be increasing the impact of global warming.
Snowfields, ice caps and glaciers around the world are already melting fast, and scientists say dark-coloured microplastics deposited at these locations can make things worse by absorbing sunlight and enhancing local heating.
Clean snowpacks, icefields and glaciers can reflect much of the sunlight, but other polluting particles such as black carbon have also been found on icefields and glaciers of the Himalayas - and scientists say they accelerate the melting there.
Fast-melting glaciers on mountain ranges in different parts of the world are increasingly becoming hazards, leading to landslides and avalanches and causing glacial lakes to burst their banks.
The rapid thinning and retreat of glaciers also poses a threat to water supplies and agriculture in mountain regions around the world.
